Advokat Ivan Ninić je naveo da je u advokatske krugove procurila kredibilna informacija da je održan sastanak iz vrha pravosuđa sa ministarkom pravde, na kome je usaglašen spisak od 55 imena tužilaca u Beogradu koji teba da budu izabrani i da karijerno napreduju.
The main conceptual idea of the text is the alleged manipulation of the judicial system in Serbia.
Advokat Ivan Ninić claims that a meeting took place between key figures in the judiciary (the President of Serbia, head of the Judicial Council, and Supreme Court Justice) and the Minister of Justice. He states that this meeting resulted in a pre-selected list of 55 prosecutors in Belgrade, who are expected to be appointed and promoted, potentially bypassing meritocratic processes. Ninić further alleges that this list includes "servile" candidates and those with close connections, highlighting concerns about potentially biased and opaque selection processes within the legal system.
Essentially, the text raises serious concerns about potential cronyism and the politicisation of judicial appointments in Serbia.
The main conceptual idea of the text is the alleged manipulation of the judicial system in Serbia. Advokat Ivan Ninić claims that a meeting took place between key figures in the judiciary (the President of Serbia, head of the Judicial Council, and Supreme Court Justice) and the Minister of Justice. He states that this meeting resulted in a pre-selected list of 55 prosecutors in Belgrade, who are expected to be appointed and promoted, potentially bypassing meritocratic processes. Ninić further alleges that this list includes "servile" candidates and those with close connections, highlighting concerns about potentially biased and opaque selection processes within the legal system. Essentially, the text raises serious concerns about potential cronyism and the politicisation of judicial appointments in Serbia.
